If you are like most people, you would like to have a dollar for every time you have heard those words spewing from the mouth of somebody in Washington, DC. Generally, these politicos are banking on the fact that the average American has no idea how the tax burden is distributed across our society. And, it is always an easy sell when benefits are promised that will be paid for by somebody else. But what are the facts as they relate to our federal income tax burden?
As incredible as the title may seem, it can be true for certain taxpayers. To assist lower income taxpayers in saving for their retirements, the Retirement Savings Contribution Credit was introduced in 2001. This credit is a “subsidy” of up to $1,000 for an individual filer and $2,000 for those married filing jointly. In order to be eligible, the taxpayer(s) must be over 18, not be a full-time student and not be claimed as a dependent on someone else’s tax return. Obviously, retirement plan contributions must have been made in the tax year for which the credit is being claimed. Also, keep in mind that tax credits are more valuable than tax deductions since credits offset tax liabilities on a dollar-for dollar basis.
Investors must be aware of the income tax implications of their trading activities. Most know that selling a financial security is a taxable event* and that doing so will usually create a realized capital gain (or loss). Brokers have long advised their clients to “harvest” capital losses as year end approaches since such a realized loss can be used to offset realized capital gains that may have been taken earlier in the tax year. The Internal Revenue Code even allows net realized capital losses (limited to $3,000 annually) to be used to offset ordinary income reported elsewhere on a client’s tax return. This loss harvesting strategy has been practiced for years and is well established in the investment/income tax toolbox. However, far fewer investors are cognizant that harvesting long term capital gains on investments (as opposed to losses) may also be a wise strategy for certain taxpayers.
The financial press generates numerous articles about federal estate transfer taxes, often detailing the misadventures regarding the estates of the rich and famous. However, only 1% of estates generate any estate transfer taxes. A working knowledge of the rules applying to possible income taxes, however, is more relevant to many more estates. Parents who are desiring to treat multiple children or heirs equally are sometimes surprised to learn that bequeathing equal dollar amounts will not be equitable after Uncle Sam’s claims are considered.
We’ll start the year with yet another way for the charitably inclined to reduce their income tax burden. Our posting from December 22, 2020 discussed how Donor Advised Funds can be used to “bunch” several years of donations into one tax year. Doing so may generate enough deductions to allow the taxpayer to reach the higher thresholds for itemized deductions created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Today’s topic allows charitably inclined traditional IRA owners to avoid taxation directly.
Our last posting covered tax-saving strategies for the charitably inclined. This week we will cover some tax breaks available to lower-income individuals to assist them in saving for retirement.
Our most recent posting covered two capital gains strategies that can result in income tax savings. Today, we will address Donor Advised Funds (DAF’s). A Donor Advised Fund is a charitable giving vehicle that has enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years, especially with the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. To participate in a donor advised fund, a donating individual opens an account and contributes cash, securities or other financial instruments. The total contribution amount can be claimed as an itemized deduction in the tax year in which the contributions are made. DAF’s can be opened at a variety of sponsoring organizations such as Vanguard Charitable, Fidelity Charitable, the American Endowment Foundation, among others. Once the account has been established and funded, the donor takes on the role of advisor to the DAF. The donor/advisor directs the sponsor to make distributions in the form of cash gifts to eligible 501(C)3 charities. These charitable directives do not have to take place in the tax year the contribution was made; rather, they can be made in the future at the donor/advisor’s discretion.
Regular readers of our blog may recall a posting from October 6, 2020 that looked at the history and evolution of our federal Income tax system. Our next four articles will discuss some ideas and strategies that can result in tax savings for eligible individuals. It is a well-established fact that many Americans have a limited understanding of our tax code. However, that ignorance can cause them to miss out on some savings opportunities and/or pay more income taxes than necessary. Keep in mind that we will not be suggesting aggressive accounting for deductions and dubious tax shelters. Rather, we’ll call attention to some 100% legitimate ideas for reducing an income tax bill. You simply must be aware of the strategy in order to employ it!
“You have a silent partner in your IRA and 401K and his name is Uncle Sam.” Kiplinger
Most people have never considered this, but the reality is that your IRA and 401k are joint accounts with the IRS. The dollars you contribute to either of those accounts are dollars that have never been taxed. Ultimately, Uncle Sam will determine how much of that money you keep, and how much he takes.
Today we will look at everyone’s favorite federal program—-Income taxes!! Believe it or not, federal income taxes are a relatively recent development. They did not exist in the United States at its infancy. In fact, the first federal income taxes were imposed by the Revenue Act of 1861 in order to pay for the Civil War. That tax was rescinded in 1872. The Federal Income Tax system we’ve grown to love was created in 1913 by the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It began as a 1% tax on net personal incomes above $3,000 with a 6% surtax on incomes above $500,000. With the U.S. entrance into World War I requiring funding in 1918, the top rate was increased to 77% on incomes exceeding $1,000,000. That top marginal rate was reduced to 58% in 1922, to 25% in 1925 and lastly to 24% in 1929. With the onset of the Great Depression, government coffers were under duress and the 1932 top marginal rate was raised to 63%.